Eastern Pennsylvania Youth Soccer Director of Coaching Mike Barr
Posted by: Coach Mike Barr
Your pre-game talk to youth soccer players doesn't need to be all fire and brimstone whereby you fire up the troops for battle. Rather, the pre-game talk is a good time to review, and prepare the team for the game. It shouldn't be a long, drawn out speech because you'll lose the players' attention. Here are some key points for what to cover in a pre-game talk:
* Review what the team has been practicing in the sessions leading up to the game.
* Set goals and objectives for the team and have players set individual goals.
* Go over the field conditions and how the weather could factor in if at all
* Tell players to stay hydrated especially in hot weather.
* Name the starting lineup
* Remind players to work hard, have fun, give their best effort
It's really quite simple. Just follow the above suggestions and remember to: Be brief. Be clear. Be concise.
Posted by: Coach Mike Barr
Last night at the Philadelphia Union game, I had the opportunity to chat with Anson Dorrance as I just happened to be sitting next to him. I've read all of his books and those written about him, as well as studied his coaching DVDs and I've heard him speak, attended field sessions where he was a guest featured clinician, and he was one of my instructors when I took the NSCAA Premier Diploma coaching course. So I am well versed in Anson's philosophies and methodologies, and I subscribe to many of them. You can only imagine how excited I was when he took the seat next to mine at the game!
I found him to be quite personable, down-to-earth and very open to converse with me about the intricacies of the game, player development, the future of women's soccer in the United States and other topics. It was awesome to be able to chat with the most successful coach in all of women's college soccer, the pioneer for the women's game and a world champion coach of the US Women's National team. He is a coach for whom I have the utmost respect and truly admire for not only what he has accomplished on the field, but the impact he has made on the lives of so many young female soccer players.
I was interested to hear about his thoughts on many topics, but wanted to respect his desire to watch the game and I didn't want to be a distraction. He was very conversational and welcomed my questions with thoughtful answers and insights. I asked him about the new curriculum recently rolled out by U.S. Soccer, which he totally embraces as it is supported by scientific research regarding social and cognitive development of children. We also discussed the importance of young girls to become fans of the game and its players. They don't watch the game enough and there needs to be a way for them to want to watch it, follow a team and have role models to emulate both on and off the field. I also inquired about the state of the premier game on the female side with regard to ODP, the ECNL, and U.S. Soccer Training Centers. He was very frank in his response that ODP has a place in his heart as it was part of his generation, but that he doesn't have the answer. He told me that if I figure it out to let him know! We covered so many different topics and I even had a chance to hear his comments on the Union game that was happening right in front of us just four rows from the field.
Overall, it was an honor for me to be able to chat with Anson. I walked away with so many other questions in my head that I wished I had asked him if I only had the time. Nonetheless, it was amazing even if it was so short!
Posted by: Coach Mike Barr
Quite a week for US Soccer! The failure of the U20's to qualify for the World Cup, The US National Team's uneventful loss to Paraguay, and the Women's National Team's loss to England's more creative style of play. What will be the next great solution? Create more academies, bring in more European coaches, listen to the same tired rhetoric from the same coaches we have been listening to for many years or will we finally come up with ideas that reflect our society and what we offer as a country.
Can you remember the 1990 World Cup, The US lost all three matches 6-1 to Czechoslovakia, 2-1 to Austria, and 1-0 to Italy. The US held their own against Italy who finished third. Not a great showing but the squad was all college or ex college players. Has the US made the strides we should have over the last twenty one years in the international arena? The US women were once the model for developing a national team. Is this the case in 2011?
Some thoughts occur to me on a consistent basis. We do not need more insignificant matches for all players under 12 years of age, we do not need teams to play four to eight useless tournaments a year, we do not need more overpaid coaches making up to $90 an hour who get paid based on results and not development, we do not need the exclusive environment we have created for wealthy clubs, we do not need our best coaches working with U15, U16 and U17 players.
What we do need is a rational approach to development in our country that raises the quality of play for the average player at every socio-economic level, which will than raise the level of play for the elite player. We need the local club environment to rekindle the passion that has been lost to recruiting and the promises of large clubs. We need quality training with the ball, as opposed to more matches at the young ages. We need travel play to start at U12. We need to provide our young players rest from soccer during the year and encourage them to try other sports when they are young. We need to have small sided play to at least U12. We need to come up with a program that all players, parents and coaches can embrace and understand. We shuld xamine our schools and universities and utilize the knowledge of coaches, specific trainers, psychogists and stae of the art faclities. Also, the MLS needs American player on the field. Not on roster or reserve squad. There is no reason a country this size should accept mediocrity.
US Soccer needs to reexamine the direction of soccer from the U6 player to the adult and come up with clear directions and guidelines that benefit everyone involved with the sport.
Posted by: Coach Mike Barr
2011
Performance. Ideals, quality, outlook, training, learning. 2011
Barcelona's Xavi believes there is no point in playing football unless you pass the ball. Photograph: Solarpix.com
Many have described Barcelona's 5-0 win over Real Madrid last November as the greatest performance ever. Even Wayne Rooney admits that he stood up in his living room and started applauding.
[Xavi's face lights up]. Yeah? Really? Rooney? That makes me proud. Rooney, wow! Rooney is extraordinary, he could play for Barcelona. And before people imagine headlines like "Xavi says Rooney to join Barcelona" – although, I'd love him to! – what I mean is that he's our kind of player. That game was wonderful, the best I've played. The feeling of superiority was incredible – and against Real Madrid! They didn't touch the ball. Madre mía, what a match! In the dressing room, we gave ourselves a standing ovation.
You mention Barcelona's dominance of possession. It's tempting to conclude that we've never seen a team with an identity – for better or worse – as clear as the current Barcelona and Spain teams. It's all about possession. And that's your identity – one that seems to have become dominant.
It's good that the reference point for world football right now is Barcelona, that it's Spain. Not because it's ours but because of what it is. Because it's an attacking football, it's not speculative, we don't wait. You pressure, you want possession, you want to attack. Some teams can't or don't pass the ball. What are you playing for? What's the point? That's not football. Combine, pass, play. That's football – for me, at least. For coaches, like, I don't know, [Javier] Clemente or [Fabio] Capello, there's another type of football. But it's good that Barcelona's style is now a model, not that.
But some claimed Spain were boring at the World Cup. You kept winning 1-0.
That's upside down. It's not that we were boring, it is the other team that was. What did Holland look for? Penalties. Or [Arjen] Robben on the break. Bam, bam, bam. Of course we were boring – the opposition made it that way. Paraguay? What did they do? Built a spectacularly good defensive system and waited for chances – from dead balls. Up it goes, rebound, loose ball. It's harder than people realise when you've got a guy behind you who's two metres tall and right on top of you.
So, what's the solution?
Think quickly, look for spaces. That's what I do: look for spaces. All day. I'm always looking. All day, all day. [Xavi starts gesturing as if he is looking around, swinging his head]. Here? No. There? No. People who haven't played don't always realise how hard that is. Space, space, space. It's like being on the PlayStation. I think shit, the defender's here, play it there. I see the space and pass. That's what I do.
That's at the heart of the Barcelona model and runs all the way through the club, doesn't it? When you beat Madrid, eight of the starting XI were youth-team products and all three finalists in this year's Ballon d'Or were too – Lionel Messi, Andrés Iniesta and you.
Some youth academies worry about winning, we worry about education. You see a kid who lifts his head up, who plays the pass first time, pum, and you think, 'Yep, he'll do.' Bring him in, coach him. Our model was imposed by [Johan] Cruyff; it's an Ajax model. It's all about rondos [piggy in the middle]. Rondo, rondo, rondo. Every. Single. Day. It's the best exercise there is. You learn responsibility and not to lose the ball. If you lose the ball, you go in the middle. Pum-pum-pum-pum, always one touch. If you go in the middle, it's humiliating, the rest applaud and laugh at you.
Your Barcelona team-mate Dani Alves said that you don't play to the run, you make the run by obliging team-mates to move into certain areas. "Xavi," he said, "plays in the future."
They make it easy. My football is passing but, wow, if I have Dani, Iniesta, Pedro, [David] Villa … there are so many options. Sometimes, I even think to myself: man, so-and-so is going to get annoyed because I've played three passes and haven't given him the ball yet. I'd better give the next one to Dani because he's gone up the wing three times. When Leo [Messi] doesn't get involved, it's like he gets annoyed … and the next pass is for him.
You're talking about style over success but not only can they go together, they have to go together, don't they? Arsenal play great football, Arsène Wenger is a hugely respected coach, but they've not won anything for years. Could that happen at Barcelona?
Almost impossible. If you go two years without winning, everything has to change. But you change names, not identity. The philosophy can't be lost. Our fans wouldn't understand a team that sat back and played on the break. Sadly, people only look at teams through success. Now, success has validated our approach. I'm happy because, from a selfish point of view, six years ago I was extinct; footballers like me were in danger of dying out. It was all: two metres tall, powerful, in the middle, knockdowns, second balls, rebounds … but now I see Arsenal and Villarreal and they play like us.
Do you see yourself as a defender of the faith? An ideologue?
It was that or die. I'm a romantic. I like the fact that talent, technical ability, is valued above physical condition now. I'm glad that's the priority; if it wasn't, there wouldn't be the same spectacle. Football is played to win but our satisfaction is double. Other teams win and they're happy, but it's not the same. The identity is lacking. The result is an impostor in football. You can do things really, really well – last year we were better than Inter Milan – but did not win. There's something greater than the result, more lasting. A legacy. Inter won the Champions League but no one talks about them. People discovered me since Euro 2008, but I've been playing the same way for years. It is true, though, that I have grown in confidence and tranquillity. And that comes with success.
Has English football suffered because it embraces a different footballing culture?
It has changed; the style's a bit more technical. But before it was direct, it was about the second ball, the typical No9 was a Crouch or a Heskey and there was no football. Carragher, boom, up top; Terry, boom, up top. I think it's changing: Barry, Lampard, Gerrard, Carrick … they are players who treat the ball well. You see them now and think, Christ, they are trying to play.
Is Paul Scholes the English Xavi?
[Xavi interrupts, almost bursting with enthusiasm] Paul Scholes! A role model. For me – and I really mean this – he's the best central midfielder I've seen in the last 15, 20 years. I've spoken to Xabi Alonso about him. He's spectacular, he has it all: the last pass, goals, he's strong, he doesn't lose the ball, vision. If he'd been Spanish he might have been rated more highly. Players love him.
England seems to mistrust technical players.
It's a pity. Talent has to be the priority. Technical ability. Always, always. Sure, you can win without it but it's talent that makes the difference. Look at the teams: Juventus, who makes the difference? Krasic. Del Piero. Liverpool? Gerrard, or Torres before. Talento. Talento. When you look at players and ask yourself who's the best: talento. Cesc, Nasri, Ryan Giggs – that guy is a joy, incredible. Looking back, I loved John Barnes and Chris Waddle was buenísimo. [Open-mouthed, eyes gleaming] Le Tissier! Although their style was different I liked Roy Keane and Paul Ince together, too. That United team was great – my English team. If I'd gone anywhere, it would have been there.
In England do we overrate physical players? You mention Carragher, Terry …
Whoa! Wait! Be careful. They're fundamental. We've got Puyol. Technically he might not be the best but it's incredible the way he defends. Carragher and Terry are necessary, brilliant, but they have to adapt to technical football [not the other way round]. For me, that comes naturally – or for Messi, Iniesta or Rooney. Others have to work at it. For them it's harder to lift their head up and play a pass – but they have to.
But when a player is offered to a club, the first question is: "how tall is he?"
Have you seen [the Villarreal winger] Santi Cazorla? You think I'm small, he's up to here on me [Xavi signals his chest]. And yet he's brilliant. Messi is the same and he's the best player in the world. Maybe it's the culture, I don't know, but in England you're warriors. You watch Liverpool and Carragher wins the ball and boots it into the stands and the fans applaud. There's a roar! They'd never applaud that here.
Next week you play Arsenal again in the Champions League last 16. Are they different? A kind of Barcelona-lite?
Arsenal are a great team. When I watch Arsenal, I see Barça. I see Cesc carry the game, Nasri, Arshavin. The difference between them and us is we have more players who think before they play, quicker. Education is the key. Players have had 10 or 12 years here. When you arrive at Barça the first thing they teach you is: think. Think, think, think. Quickly. [Xavi starts doing the actions, looking around himself.] Lift your head up, move, see, think. Look before you get the ball. If you're getting this pass, look to see if that guy is free. Pum. First time. Look at [Sergio] Busquets – the best midfielder there is playing one-touch. He doesn't need more. He controls, looks and passes in one touch. Some need two or three and, given how fast the game is, that's too slow. Alves, one touch. Iniesta, one touch. Messi, one touch. Piqué, one touch. Busi [Busquets], me … seven or eight players with one touch. Fast. In fact, [the youth coach] Charly [Rexach] always used to say: a mig toc. Half a touch.
Arsenal-Barcelona always provokes questions about Cesc Fábregas's future.
If I'd ever gone to another club, I'd have been thinking about Barcelona – the link is strong. The same is happening to him. But now there's a problem: now he's expensive. But I think that a footballer ends up playing where he wants. He has to end up here.
That's not what Arsenal fans want to hear and some have accused Barcelona players, you included, of stirring trouble. Last summer there were so many remarks supposedly coming out of Barcelona …
Really? I hardly spoke then. I imagine they wouldn't have liked that. [Xavi pauses, adding quietly, almost shamefacedly] You know, often footballers don't think. We're selfish, we don't realise. I also say it because I'm thinking of Cesc. He wants to come here. Barcelona has always been his dream. But of course he's Arsenal's captain, the standard bearer, a leader. This situation is a putada [bummer] for him. He's at a club that plays his style with Wenger who has treated him well, taught him, raised him. Cesc respects him. If he'd been at, say, Blackburn it might have been easier to leave. Look, the truth is: I want him to come here. Of course. Barcelona have a very clear style and not many footballers fit. It's not easy. But Cesc fits it perfectly.
Would he replace you, though?
I don't see new players as a threat; I don't say "this is my patch". I'm more: "bring them here, let them play". The more talent in the middle, the better. Four or five years ago [people said] me and Iniesta couldn't play together. We can't play together? Look how that one turned out.
Last year, you beat Arsenal comfortably …
Yes, but this year they're much better. I think it's a disadvantage for us that we played last year. They had [too] much respect for us. It was as if they let us have the ball; we always had it, home and away. The game in London could have been a 4-0 we dominated so much – but it finished 2-2. This year will be different.
What was your reaction to the draw?
I was happy. I like the fact that we'll see a great game. Arsenal aren't the kind of team that come to try to putear you [piss you off, break up the game, destroy the match]. If it was Chelsea, you might think Madre mía, they're going to leave the initiative to you, wait deep, close up, play on the break with Drogba and Malouda. But, no, I think Arsenal will want the ball. There will be more of a game. As a fan I'd definitely pay for a ticket to see this game. Manchester United or Chelsea would play in a more speculative way. They would leave us the ball. Arsenal won't.
Does English football attract you? Spanish players always return from there raving about it.
It's incredible. Una pasada. Now that is football. England really is the birthplace, the heart and soul of football. If Barcelona had Liverpool's fans, or Arsenal's, or United's, we'd have won 20 Champions Leagues, hahaha! OK, so that's an exaggeration but I've never seen anything like it. We won 3-1 at Liverpool once and we were both applauded off the pitch. In England, footballers are respected more, the game is more noble, there's less cheating. Every Spaniard who goes loves it – and comes back a better player. If I had ever left it would have been to England.
The final is at Wembley, which makes it even more special for Barcelona, doesn't it? Last year it was special because it was at the Bernabéu but Wembley is the scene of the Dream Team's one European Cup. And this feels like a year in which you are being constantly compared to them …
In 1992, I was 12 and my brothers went but my parents wouldn't let me. I was in tears but it made no difference. I'd love to play at Wembley. It's special for Barça – and for everyone in football. Last year was more morbosa [about the rivalry with Real Madrid, almost a little dirty, titillating]. This year is more nostalgic, more classic. And I'm more of a nostalgic. Me? I'm a roman